Skip to main content
Locatalyze

SampleSample · already trading · free rent check · not a verdict

Neighbourhood café42 Example Street, Brunswick VIC 3056

Illustrative free rent check for a café already trading and heading into renewal. No stay or leave verdict. Rent bands are estimated — not a sourced series. Unlock shows the decision report from the same numbers.

Skip to decision
Locatalyze · Existing business review

Neighbourhood café

42 Example Street, Brunswick VIC 3056
Assessed 2026-10-01Existing businessIllustrative address

What you told us

Business type
Neighbourhood café
Location
42 Example Street, Brunswick VIC 3056
Opening hours
8 h/day, 7 days/week · 56 h/week open
What are you deciding?
Renewing my lease
Monthly revenue, 3-month average
$49,500/mo
Revenue, oldest of last 3 months
$48,200
Revenue, middle of last 3 months
$49,800
Revenue, latest month
$50,500
Average sale
$16.50
Transactions per day
100
Current monthly rent, ex GST
$6,200/mo
Rent basis
Gross — outgoings are in the rent
Floor area
80 sqm
Lease expiry (month and year)
2027-03-01
Has the landlord proposed a new rent?
Yes — I have a figure
Landlord proposed rent
$7,200/mo
Capacity units
4
How busy are you typically?
50–75%
Wages, total payroll
$16,000/mo
Do wages include your own pay?
Yes — my pay is in the wages figure
Cost of goods
$14,850/mo
Other operating costs
$3,200/mo
Take-home you need per month
$6,000/mo
Approximate repeat-customer rate
40–60%
Where do most of your customers come from?
1–3 km
Service duration minutes
12

Your business health

Derived dimensions

Each score is a named formula on your figures and, where you left a recommended field blank, a cited research figure. Required fields are never invented.

67
Financial health
57
Market opportunity
81
Competitive position
63
Capacity utilisation
72
Customer strength
30
Lease/rent position
How each dimension was derived
DimensionResultHow it was derived
Financial health67Uses the operating surplus on the costs you entered ($9,250).
Weighted mean: surplus ÷ revenue = 18.7%; 0 at −5% surplus, 100 at +20%; occupancy ÷ revenue = 12.5%; 100 at 0% occupancy, 0 at 20%+; cost of goods ÷ revenue = 30.0%; 100 at 0% COGS, 0 at 50%+.
Market opportunity57This score is the three-month revenue path you entered, not a census forecast.
50 + 1.5 × clamp(latest vs first of last three months, −20, +20). Latest $50,500 vs $48,200 is 4.8%.
Competitive position815 nearby operators were used. This is not a Google rank.
0.45 × (mean competitor rating 4.40 / 5) + 0.25 × density relief (5 analysed) + 0.30 × log10(mean reviews). Your own rating is not in this score unless a listing was matched in research.
Capacity utilisation63About 1820 unused transactions a month on this arithmetic.
Current transactions 3033 ÷ structural slots 4853 (hours × 60 ÷ service minutes × units × days × 52/12).
Customer strength72Repeat band only.
Mapped from repeat_rate band “40_60” (under 20% → 32, 60%+ → 88).
Lease/rent position30Face occupancy versus the revenue you entered.
100 × clamp(1 − occupancy/revenue ÷ 18%, 0, 1). Occupancy share 12.5%.

Mean of 6 scored dimensions (unscored dimensions are omitted, not filled).

The 3 things that matter most

  1. Rent represents 12.5% of revenue.

Cited pages were retrieved on 2026-10-01. A cited rental listing is not proof those premises are still for lease. Census population figures are from 2021, not a live count.

Decision report

The decision

RENEGOTIATENorthside Cup

Valid as of 2026-10-01. Not legal or financial advice. Confirm lease checklist items with your solicitor.

  • Rent is 12.5% of revenue — above the estimated 8–12% café band.
  • The landlord’s proposed 7,200 is 16.1% above current rent.
  • Walk-away rent on submitted costs is 15,450 per month, so the site can still fund a lower increase.
Highest rent you can afford
$15,450
per month
Landlord proposed
$7,200
per month
Gap
-$8,250
-$99,000 per year
Required take-home
$6,000
per month
Do this week
Ask the landlord to leave rent at $6,200 or cap the increase below 8%.
Then
Walk the 500 m radius and confirm the three like-for-like cafés.
01

Money

Financial health from the figures you entered. Illustrative arithmetic — not a forecast.

Current economics

Revenue$49,500
Cost of goods-$14,850
Wages-$16,000
Rent / occupancy-$6,200
Other costs-$3,200
Estimated operating surplus$9,250

Gross rent: outgoings are treated as already inside this figure.

Owner economics

$6,000
Required take-home
$9,250
Estimated surplus
$3,250
Estimated buffer / month

Your pay is already inside wages, so it is not added again.

Assumptions
  • Gross rent: outgoings are treated as already inside this figure.
  • Revenue is the 3-month monthly average you entered, excluding GST.
  • Your pay is already inside wages, so it is not added again.
  • All four cost groups you were asked for are present.
  • This is not a forecast and not tax or lease advice.

Break-even analysis

$36,286
Break-even revenue / month
$49,500
Current revenue
$13,214
Above break-even
26.7%
Revenue safety margin

(occupancy + wages + other) ÷ (1 − COGS/revenue) = $25,400 ÷ (1 − 30.0%).

What happens if…

Illustrative scenarios on the costs you entered. Not a forecast.

At the proposed rent
Revenue $49,500
Estimated surplus $8,250

Same revenue and costs; occupancy set to the landlord’s proposed monthly rent (plus outgoings if they were in the current occupancy).

Rent that splits the gap
Revenue $49,500
Estimated surplus $8,750

Midpoint between current occupancy and the proposed rent. Illustrative, not a negotiation outcome.

At walk-away rent
Revenue $49,500
Estimated surplus $0

Occupancy set to the highest rent that still meets the take-home you entered.

Capacity analysis

4,853
Estimated capacity / month
3,033
Current transactions / month
1,820
Approximate unused capacity

Current transactions 3033 ÷ structural slots 4853 (hours × 60 ÷ service minutes × units × days × 52/12).

If 10% of unused capacity were converted at the current average sale, the illustrative revenue opportunity would be approximately $3,003 / month. Scenario, not a forecast.

02

Lease

Rent & lease analysis — what the occupancy cost is doing to the decision.

12.5%
Rent-to-revenue
12.5%
Occupancy-to-revenue

What you are deciding. Renewing the lease

Lease attention required

  • You are deciding: Renewing the lease.
  • Occupancy is 12.5% of revenue. That is the number to take to a review, not a feeling that rent is high.
  • A renewal should open with occupancy, the review mechanism, and months to expiry — not a generic request for a discount.
03

Market

What the market, customers and price band say — separate from the P&L above.

Demand
Submitted 100 covers/day already clears 73 break-even.
Customer fit
Neighbourhood café on a residential inner-north strip.
Market trajectory
Renewal is the event. Competition is stable in this illustrative set.
  • Demand label is from utilisation / three-month takings you entered (moderate), not from population counts.
  • Customer-fit label follows the catchment you named (1 3km).
  • Trajectory follows the three months of revenue you entered.

What your customers are telling you

Renegotiate. The books work at current rent. Do not accept a 16.1% lift without a corresponding covers or ticket story.

Pricing

Current position is the band you chose, not a modelled price.

BudgetValueMidPremium

Average sale $17.

  • Hold the $16.50 ticket. Do not discount to fund rent.
04

Plan

Risks, the next 90 days, and the questions that should change what you do this week.

Risk radar

RiskLevelReason
Rent pressureMediumOccupancy ÷ revenue = 12.5%. High ≥ 18%, medium ≥ 12%.
CompetitionMedium5 relevant operators were analysed. Density is a researched count, not a vibe.
Customer concentrationLowRepeat band 40 60; catchment 1 3km.
CapacityLowUtilisation score 63 / 100 on the formula above.
MarginMediumCost of goods is 30.0% of revenue. High ≥ 40%, medium ≥ 30%.

Your next 90 days

0–30 days
Ask the landlord to leave rent at $6,200 or cap the increase below 8%.
30–60 days
Walk the 500 m radius and confirm the three like-for-like cafés.
60–90 days
Reprice the all-day menu so the $16.50 ticket holds on weekdays.

If you do only three things

  • Ask the landlord to leave rent at $6,200 or cap the increase below 8%.
  • Walk the 500 m radius and confirm the three like-for-like cafés.
  • Reprice the all-day menu so the $16.50 ticket holds on weekdays.

Questions you should ask yourself

Observation
Weekday or off-peak capacity appears underused on the hours and transactions you entered.

Ask: Could you attract a defined extra handful of customers in a named quiet window without adding staff?

Observation
Rent / occupancy is 12.5% of revenue.

Ask: Would changing the next rent review materially improve the surplus on this page?

Observation
Required take-home is $6,000; estimated surplus is $9,250.

Ask: Is the take-home target the same cash already inside wages, or extra?

05

Supporting research

Agent evidence, modelled money, and location context behind the decision. The numbered chapters above are the operating pack.

Decisive evidence

Rent is A$6,200 on A$49,500 revenue (12.5%).
Why it matters — This is the figure the renewal conversation is about.
Walk-away rent on submitted costs is A$15,450 per month.
Why it matters — The proposed A$7,200 still leaves surplus, so exit is not forced.

Why this score

The address score is the weighted average of the components printed on that report. The weights are chosen for that business and add to 100. They are not a fixed rent, competition, demand, profitability and location-quality split.

Pushed the score up
  • Trading performance scored 72 (weight 0.25%)
  • Competition scored 61 (weight 0.25%)
Held the score down
  • Rent load scored 42 · 0.17 points lost · weight 0.3%
Rent loadweight 0.3%
42
Rent is 12.5% of revenue, above the estimated 8–12% café band.
Competitionweight 0.25%
61
Three like-for-like cafés inside 500 m. Defensible, not empty.
Trading performanceweight 0.25%
72
100 covers/day at $16.50 clears break-even of 73 covers/day.
Lease positionweight 0.2%
55
Proposed lift is optional; walk-away rent is still A$15,450.

Key risks

Most likely to make this location fail — ranked by severity.

Rent share is already stretched
Impact 12.5% of revenue is above the estimated 8–12% café band before the proposed lift.
High
Proposed 16.1% increase
Impact A$7,200 would raise rent load further. Walk-away is A$15,450, so the site can refuse the full lift.
Action Leave rent at A$6,200, or cap any increase so rent stays near the 8–12% band.
Medium
Three direct cafés inside 500 m
Impact Like-for-like competitors can cap covers if the strip slows.
Action Walk the 500 m radius and confirm the three like-for-like cafés.
Medium

Use conditions and verification to pressure-test these risks before signing.

Conditions to proceed

  • Leave rent at A$6,200, or cap any increase so rent stays near the 8–12% band.
  • Confirm the lease is gross and outgoings are not added on top.
  • Hold the A$16.50 ticket. Do not discount to fund a higher rent.

Verify before signing

  • Confirm outgoings are not extra on a gross lease.
  • Count like-for-like cafés on a weekday morning walk of 500 m.

What would change the verdict

Stated by the research for this site — not a calculator inventing rent or ticket cut-offs. Where a numeric test was not available, the change is described and marked unknown.

▲ Could improve to
Rent moves back toward 8–12% of the A$49,500 revenue, at the same A$16.50 ticket.
Would move to Stay and optimise
▼ Could fall to
The landlord holds the lift to A$7,200 and covers fall toward the 73-a-day break-even.
Would move to Leave

Financial drivers named in the model

Average ticket
Revenue and break-even both move with this ticket. No other ticket is used.
Change tested — $16.50Your input

Money model

Screening economics for this concept. Net profit is before tax and depreciation. These are model outputs under your inputs and the research assumptions — not measured trading results.

Built from your inputs (rent $6,200/mo) and actual revenue $49,500/mo. Other cost and demand lines are researched, derived or benchmarked — see figure labels.

Base-case net profit
$9,250 per monthModelled
per month, before tax
Base-case revenue
$49,500 per monthYour input
3000 units / mo
Break-even
2,190 covers per monthModelled
units / mo to cover costs
Recover setup
Not applicable
Already trading — no setup payback. Do not quote a payback period.
Base net margin18.7%Net profit ÷ revenue from the scenario tableModelled
Rent to revenue12.5%Your rent ÷ actual monthly revenueModelled
Downside / base / upside utilisation scenarios
ScenarioUtilisationUnits / moRevenueNet profit
DownsideNot yet established.2,400 covers$39,600 per month$2,320 per month
BaseNot yet established.3,000 covers$49,500 per month$9,250 per month
UpsideNot yet established.3,600 covers$59,400 per month$16,180 per month
Downside
Utilisation
Not yet established.
Units / mo
2,400 covers
Revenue
$39,600 per month
Net profit
$2,320 per month
Base
Utilisation
Not yet established.
Units / mo
3,000 covers
Revenue
$49,500 per month
Net profit
$9,250 per month
Upside
Utilisation
Not yet established.
Units / mo
3,600 covers
Revenue
$59,400 per month
Net profit
$16,180 per month

Scenario figures are modelled from the same drivers as the KPIs above. Basis labels live on the KPI cards. Capacity ceiling ≈ 4800 units/month. Labels map agent scenarios to Downside / Base / Upside for reading clarity — underlying numbers are unchanged.

Unit economics & setup capital

Revenue unit — cover

Price per unit
$16.50Your input
as modelled
Contribution per unit
$11.55Modelled
before fixed costs
Variable cost per unit
$4.95Modelled
direct cost
Contribution margin
70%Modelled
contribution ÷ price
What would tighten this model (2)
Outgoings on top of the gross rent
Why — A gross lease that still bills outgoings would raise the 12.5% rent share.
How — Read the lease and the last four outgoings invoices.
Weekday versus weekend covers
Why — The 100 covers a day is an average. A weak weekday changes the rent conversation.
How — Use the POS, split by day, for the last 12 weeks.
Cost structure detail
Operating costs
Rent$6,200 per month
Wages (includes owner pay)$16,000 per month
Cost of goods$14,850 per month
Other operating costs$3,200 per month
Key assumptions (4)
Monthly revenue A$49,500 from $16.50 ticket × 100 covers/day × 30 days.
Basis: Your input
Net profit A$9,250 per month (18.7% of revenue).
Basis: Modelled
Customers per trading day needed to cover rent, wages and other fixed costs at the submitted ticket. Not months to cumulative profit.
Basis: Modelled
Already trading — no setup payback. Do not quote a payback period.
Basis: Uncertain

Negotiate

Modelled from your revenue using Locatalyze's rent-burden thresholds (14% / 18%). This is not a market-rent valuation.

USER INPUTActual / operator-provided revenue — 14% and 18% thresholds use your stated monthly revenue. ($49,500/mo)
Asking rent USER INPUT
$6,200/mo
Your quoted / actual monthly rent (USER INPUT).
Modelled affordable rent MODELLED
$6,930/mo
Derived from your revenue × 14% (Locatalyze healthy rent-burden ceiling). Not market rent, not fair rent, and not what a landlord should charge.
vs modelled affordable MODELLED
$0/mo
Asking rent is at or below the modelled affordable ceiling for your economics.

Modelled affordable rent = revenue above × 14%. Asking rent is at or below that modelled ceiling. Neither figure is market rent, fair rent, or a recommendation of what the landlord should charge.

What could change the gap

  • UNKNOWN Outgoings are not confirmed — all-in occupancy (face + outgoings) cannot be computed yet.

Refine commercial terms

Optional. Add outgoings and incentives to refine first-year cash — not a longer form.

OutgoingsAdd monthly outgoings to refine all-in occupancy cost. Missing outgoings are not treated as $0.

Selected scenario: Current ask · face rent $6,200/mo · outgoings not confirmed

Face rent USER INPUT
$6,200/mo
Monthly outgoings UNKNOWN
Not enough information
All-in occupancy cost UNKNOWN
Not enough information
Not enough information — enter monthly outgoings to compute face + outgoings.

Rent relief

Rent-free / temporary reductions lower year-1 occupancy cash. They do not permanently change face rent.

Effective first-year face rent (outgoings unknown) ASSUMPTION
$6,200/mo

No rent relief entered

Capital contribution

Fit-out / landlord contribution is capital support — shown separately, never as a rent cut.

No capital contribution entered

How these numbers are calculated
  • Modelled affordable rent = revenue × 14%. Modelled watch threshold = revenue × 18%. Both are MODELLED from your economics — not market rent.
  • Outgoings not supplied (UNKNOWN). All-in occupancy is not computed until outgoings are entered — missing outgoings are not treated as $0.
Rent as % of revenue MODELLED
12.5%
Modelled watch threshold MODELLED
$8,910/mo

What to confirm before you commit

Commercial checks only — not a solicitor's lease review.

Negotiation snapshot

On the current assumptions (operator-provided revenue), asking rent is at or below the modelled 14% affordable ceiling. Confirm outgoings and lease terms before treating the deal as settled.

Modelled from your revenue using Locatalyze's rent-burden thresholds (14% / 18%). This is not a market-rent valuation, and not legal or financial advice.

How it's performing

Covers clear break-even. The problem is rent as a share of revenue and the proposed lift, not an empty diary.

Primary gap: occupancy cost.

$49,500 per monthYour input
Actual revenue / mo
How this was tested (2)
Rent / revenue vs estimated café band
12.5% vs estimated 8–12%. Stretched before any increase.
Covers vs break-even
100 covers/day vs 73 needed at $16.50. Throughput is not the failure mode.

Benchmarks

Industry and local references — labelled separately from your modelled P&L.

Rent per sqm$930 per sqm per yearInside the estimated asking bandbenchmark $810 per sqm per year–$1,125 per sqm per year
Rent-to-revenue12.53%Above the estimated café bandbenchmark 8%–12%

Market & demand

The café already trades. Demand is the covers you entered, not a forecast of whether to open.

100 covers/dayYour input
Submitted covers per day
100 covers/day vs 73 break-even is the operating cushion.
24,896 peopleResearched↗
Brunswick population, ABS Census 2021
A large inner-north suburb, not a small catchment. This is suburb population, not customers at the door.
34 yearsResearched↗
Brunswick median age, ABS Census 2021
Younger than the Victorian median of 38. Fits weekday coffee more than a retirement catchment.
$2,096 per weekResearched↗
Brunswick median weekly household income, ABS Census 2021
Above the Victorian median of $1,759. Supports a $16.50 ticket. It is not proof of café spend.

Demand constraints that matter for the decision

  • Three like-for-like cafés already sit inside 500 m
  • Weekend destination trade is not guaranteed on this fictional pin

Demand drivers that matter here

Residential density on the Brunswick inner-north gridWeekday worker coffee from nearby light-industrial and studio tenancies

Method — Submitted trading figures, not a new-site catchment model · medium confidence

Property & rent

Rent evidence (3)
PremisesAs listedAnnualMonthlyPer sqm / yrGST and outgoings
Illustrative listing A, Brunswick$5,400 per month$64,800$5,400$810 per sqm per yearGST not stated, outgoings not stated
Illustrative listing B, Brunswick$6,800 per month$81,600$6,800$1,020 per sqm per yearGST not stated, outgoings not stated
Illustrative listing C, Brunswick$7,500 per month$90,000$7,500$1,125 per sqm per yearGST not stated, outgoings not stated

Lease position

Renegotiate. Current rent is stretched as a share of revenue. Proposed lift is optional; walk-away rent is still above the proposal.

Lease expiry2027-03-01 (date)
Actual monthly rent $6,200 per month

Lease actions

  • Put the estimated 8–12% rent-to-revenue band on the table, labelled as estimated.
  • Counter the 16.1% proposed lift with a smaller step that stays under walk-away rent.

Competition

3 direct café competitors within 500 m. 2 adjacent food operators. Counts match the lists below.

3 local direct competitors · 2 adjacent · 2 substitutes · facts below; strengths/weaknesses are interpretation.

Distance from the searched point

Straight-line or approximate distances already in the research. Competitor coordinates were not stored, so this is not a map of pins.

Nearest direct competitors
OperatorDistanceHow measured
Example Roast Brunswick
Nearby Example Lane, Brunswick VIC 3056
180.0 kmResearched
Corner Cup Example
Example Road, Brunswick VIC 3056
320.0 kmResearched
Parkside Brew Example
Example Street, Brunswick VIC 3056
450.0 kmResearched

Where demand leaks

Weekday morning → Adjacent bakeries and home coffee
Workers can buy coffee at a bakery counter or bring it from home.
Weekend → Other inner-north cafés
Destination cafés elsewhere in inner Melbourne can pull the discretionary visit.

Direct competitors

Example Roast Brunswick180.0 km
Direct café competitor
★ 4.4128 reviews
Corner Cup Example320.0 km
Direct café competitor
★ 4.286 reviews
Parkside Brew Example450.0 km
Direct café competitor
★ 4.6210 reviews
Adjacent players & substitutes (4)
Example Bakery Counter220.0 km
Adjacent
Example Lunch Bar480.0 km
Adjacent
Home and office coffee
Substitute, not a café competitor
Supermarket and bakery coffee
Substitute
Further upsides (2)

Extra evidence-backed upsides — not generic positivity.

Hold rent or cap the increase
Current rent still leaves A$9,250 net. A smaller step than 16.1% keeps the model intact.
Protect the $16.50 ticket
Break-even is 73 covers/day at this ticket. Discounting is the faster way to miss it.

What to do next

Concrete moves for this site, drawn from this assessment. Prefer these over generic checklists.

Do this first

  1. 1Leave rent at A$6,200, or cap any increase so rent stays near the 8–12% band.
  2. 2Confirm the lease is gross and outgoings are not added on top.
  3. 3Hold the A$16.50 ticket. Do not discount to fund a higher rent.
  4. 4Ask the landlord to leave rent at $6,200 or cap the increase below 8%.
  5. 5Walk the 500 m radius and confirm the three like-for-like cafés.

Full checklist: conditions and verification · ranked risks · sequence below when ready to act.

Finding → why it matters → what to check

Ask the landlord to leave rent at $6,200 or cap the increase below 8%.this week effort
Why it matters: Expiry is the leverage window.
Walk the 500 m radius and confirm the three like-for-like cafés.this week effort
Why it matters: The competitor count in this sample is illustrative; a live run uses the map.
Reprice the all-day menu so the $16.50 ticket holds on weekdays.30 days effort
Why it matters: Break-even is 73 covers/day; ticket is the other lever besides rent.

Supporting detail

Background research that supports the decision above. Expand only what you need — printing this page includes it.

What we assessedConcept & premises needs

Neighbourhood café serving coffee and all-day food to local residents and nearby workers

Workforce2Roles, wages, qualifications
Owner-operator barista
Owner pay is inside the A$16,000 wage line.
Floor / kitchen support
All-day food at 100 covers/day is not a one-person roster.
Regulation & compliance2Licences and requirements
Food business registration
Authority: Moreland / Merri-bek City Council

Requirements

  • Food safety supervisor
Other figures we found1Every other number in the research
Financial model
Structural capacity per month4,800 covers per month

How this report was checked

Numbers audited
12
0 unlabelled · 0 unsourced
Sources cited
4
every figure traceable
Decisive facts
4
each with a resolvable link
Validator
sample-numbers-contract
movement guards active

Where sources disagreed

Suburb population is not café demand
24,896 residents do not mean 24,896 customers. · Preferred: Use the submitted 100 covers a day for the trading decision

Known evidence gaps

No sourced commercial asking-rent series for Brunswick.
Rent per sqm comps are estimated. The landlord evidence page is held back.
All 4 sources
Submitted rent, revenue, ticket and floor area — rent load, P&L — retrieved 2026-10-01high
Submitted wages, COGS, other costs and take-home — walk-away rent — retrieved 2026-10-01high
Illustrative competitor set within 500 m — direct count — retrieved 2026-10-01medium
Estimated café rent-to-revenue band — comfort band — retrieved 2026-10-01low
Figure labels

Researched measured or citedModelled calculated from inputsBenchmark industry referenceYour input you suppliedInferred interpretedUncertain not established

Report sample-b · Locatalyze location decision support · 2026-10-01
Decision support only — not financial, legal, planning or property advice. Verify conditions above before signing a lease.

After the sample

What a live report includes for your address

This page is a stored sample for Neighbourhood café. Figures here belong to that sample, not to your address. A live run needs a free account. The A$29 unlock is a model from your inputs when those inputs exist. It does not invent demand.

Buyer protection and regeneration policy

Practical protection for technical failures, with honest limits around commercial outcomes.

  • A free account is required to run the analysis. One free run. No card.
  • You see the report structure and sample output before buying.
  • Unused credits: full refund within 7 days of purchase if you have not generated a report from that payment.
Read refund policy

This sample (free rent check)

Rent check — not a stay or leave verdict

You are viewing the free already-trading output: rent as a share of revenue, estimated per-sqm bands, and timeline. The stay / renegotiate / exit verdict is in the paid decision report.

  • Rent as % of revenue vs an estimated category range
  • Rent per sqm vs estimated asking comps
  • Timeline to lease expiry or review
  • Up to 3 findings from rent and revenue only
  • Not a stay / leave recommendation

Same rent check a live already-trading run shows. See the paid decision report from these numbers →

On your address

On your current site

  • Proceed / Verify / Avoid
  • Named competitors and distances
  • Headline score and what moved it
  • Risks and what to verify before signing

Then unlock — $29 decision report

Walk-away rent, P&L, break-even as customers per day, and a 90-day plan under YOUR costs. Rent bands stay labelled estimated until we have a sourced series.

How scoring works →

Already trading?

Run a free rent check →

Free rent check first — unlock the decision report when you need a verdict.

Your address next

Run this analysis for your actual lease.

Same decision framework — Proceed, Verify, or Avoid — built from your Mapbox pin, business type, and commercial inputs. This sample is illustrative, not evidence about your site.